From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-8284-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 27282 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Nov 2003 15:46:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 20061 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2003 15:46:06 -0000
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 10:46:05 -0500
From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-ID: <20031115154605.GC26593@time>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
References: <87llqi6pg0.fsf@speakeasy.net> <200311151710.06919.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> <87y8uiniqe.fsf@speakeasy.net> <87he166m5i.fsf@speakeasy.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87he166m5i.fsf@speakeasy.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cscope ebuilds
X-Archives-Salt: f6642641-1aed-47a8-af8f-38858ee0abd6
X-Archives-Hash: a9cdf38836b7d5f43b33169a7669a9ee

--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Anupam Kapoor wrote:	[Sat Nov 15 2003, 04:01:13AM EST]
> ok. got the fix. the problem was that for installing
> 50xcscope-gentoo.el, we were using a doins instead of using the normal
> 'elisp-site-file-install'. also we should have used elisp-install for
> installing the *.el[c] files. the changes fix the problem.

Nice work tracking this down.

> two questions:
>     1. how do i send the changes back ?

File a bug at bugs.gentoo.org, assign to emacs@gentoo.org

>     2. in site-start.el, there seems to be an inconsistency in the way
>     the site files are added to the load-path. for some cases, we have=20
>=20
> (setq load-path=20
>       (cons "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dircolors" load-path))=20
>=20
> and for other cases we have
>=20
> (add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/htmlize")
>=20
> shouldn't we be doing either of the two ?

If nobody answers this on the list, you could include this question in
your bug report.

Aron

--=20
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer
Key fingerprint =3D E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76  FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0


--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/tko9JrHF4yAQTrARArRvAKCoksZ4MTQ8WyDNUwpAfXumvCRzZACfSOgy
fZoNMsbkkpY2R3gb3qXZ1xk=
=y87V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT--