[gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Benjamin Coles]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

	Due to the constant emails about a new bugzilla release I decided to
give in and update to 2.17.6. I tested bugzilla before putting it in
production and only had some minor problems which lasted about 15
minutes. Other than that everything transistioned nicely, I also added a
new resolution status "NOTOURBUG" to make things more organized instead
of "WONTFIX" which has other characteristics. If you've noticed
something out of sync or not quite right, please feel free to email me.

-------------
Thanks,
Benjamin Coles
Gentoo Infrastructure

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 300 bytes --]

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:51, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> I also added a
> new resolution status "NOTOURBUG" to make things more organized instead
> of "WONTFIX" which has other characteristics.

wouldnt it be better to use 'UPSTREAM' ?
not our bug seems to convey the wrong connotation ...
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Benjamin Coles]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1560 bytes --]

	Okay it took me a minute to figure out the "quicksearch" at the main
page at bugs.gentoo.org. It was a javascript error for the newer
browsers but it's now fixed Bug 33283.
	Lisa's issue about bug_status.html was going through an update as well
to make changes to reflect our current settings, they were the standard
bugzilla before and no one ever took the time to edit it.
	Mr_Bones, first issue taken care of one more to go!
	Vapier's issue revolving around the NOTOURBUG vs UPSTREAM... I chose
the familar resolution I've seen at other sites, there was a bug
revolving around it on bugs.gentoo.org which I closed last night due to
the upgrade, might have been better to have mentioned it in there before
I upgraded. Now we'll have to wait until next upgrade and vote for it
then.
	Mholzer can you confirm this bug yours because I got bug #33283 just
fine, it could have been when I was trying to fix the bug that mail
wasn't sent. The reason it wasn't able to send mail before was because
of the templates that we had in place where corrupted but I managed to
fix them all before this upgrade.

-------------
Thanks,
Benjamin Coles
Gentoo Infrastructure

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 06:54, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2003 08:51, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> > I also added a
> > new resolution status "NOTOURBUG" to make things more organized instead
> > of "WONTFIX" which has other characteristics.
> 
> wouldnt it be better to use 'UPSTREAM' ?
> not our bug seems to convey the wrong connotation ...
> -mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 19:53, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> 	Vapier's issue revolving around the NOTOURBUG vs UPSTREAM... I chose
> the familar resolution I've seen at other sites, there was a bug
> revolving around it on bugs.gentoo.org which I closed last night due to
> the upgrade, might have been better to have mentioned it in there before
> I upgraded. Now we'll have to wait until next upgrade and vote for it
> then.

i suggested upstream because it too is what ive seen at other places ...
debian for example uses upstream iirc
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

AW: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Martin Holzer]

Same problem with every upgrade

Bugzilla doesn't send mails any more


Martin Holzer
sVrmARTY-/irc.freenode.net

Bug-Wrangler, Gentoo Linux
 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Benjamin Coles [mailto:sj7trunks@gentoo.org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. November 2003 14:51
An: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Betreff: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade


	Due to the constant emails about a new bugzilla release I decided to
give in and update to 2.17.6. I tested bugzilla before putting it in
production and only had some minor problems which lasted about 15 minutes.
Other than that everything transistioned nicely, I also added a new
resolution status "NOTOURBUG" to make things more organized instead of
"WONTFIX" which has other characteristics. If you've noticed something out
of sync or not quite right, please feel free to email me.

-------------
Thanks,
Benjamin Coles
Gentoo Infrastructure


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla upgrade

[Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-]

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Benjamin Coles wrote:

> Due to the constant emails about a new bugzilla release I decided to
> give in and update to 2.17.6.  If you've noticed something out of sync
> or not quite right, please feel free to email me.

Two things:

First, the "View Bugs Reported Today" link off the front page seems to
be reporting far more than just "Today's" bugs.  Seems like it might be
reporting all bugs from the time of upgrade or something?

Second, the page titles for results of stored queries used to be the name
of the stored query.  For example, I have a couple of different views of
the games@g.o bugs that I keep up all the time.  Now all lists of bugs from
stored queries or manual queries have the page title of "Bug List" which
isn't as helpful when I have 5 or 6 tabs of "Bug List" to choose from.

Thanks,

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
mr_bones_@gentoo.org


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Lisa Seelye]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 419 bytes --]

On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 08:51, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> of "WONTFIX" which has other characteristics. If you've noticed
> something out of sync or not quite right, please feel free to email me.


Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /bug_status.html on this server.

Apache/1.3.29 Server at bugs.gentoo.org Port 80

-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla upgrade

[Jason Stubbs]

On Wednesday 12 November 2003 22:51, Benjamin Coles wrote:
> If you've noticed
> something out of sync or not quite right, please feel free to email me.

I just got a notification that I added an attachment to a bug 8 hours after 
the fact. I have not elected to receive notifications of changes that I make.

Regards,
Jason

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Bugzilla Upgrade

[John P. Davis]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all:
I just wanted to update everyone on the bugzilla update. Bugzilla 2.17.2 is up 
and running on my own server (bugs.uberdavis.com) with a dummy gentoo 
database (i took a snapshot of the real database a week or so back). Please 
test, and let me know if you find any errors. Please keep in mind that this 
is a temporary server, and it is not designed for massive loads, so please 
excuse its "blazing" speeds ;-)

Cheers,
//zhen


- -- 
John P. Davis
Gentoo Linux Documentation Developer / Bugzilla Administrator
http://www.gentoo.org
#gentoo-doc on irc.freenode.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+D+oxYfES/KZpj3kRAsxtAJ9j9ynj2Si85pQ3fKW3D+mFFtcRiQCeJWE8
d937wg4Dh2ydlMD1M3kcN/8=
=JZpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list