From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19330 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Nov 2003 06:37:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15100 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2003 06:37:29 -0000 From: "C. Brewer" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 22:37:48 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031104002017.71d91fc0.genone@gentoo.org> <200311051046.07921.pauldv@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200311051046.07921.pauldv@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_Cxeq/KBjUsOKn2j"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311052237.55119.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags X-Archives-Salt: 3281e724-0a5b-4eb3-9aae-115205042771 X-Archives-Hash: 180eaa6579d22f540d1e1531886b56f2 --Boundary-02=_Cxeq/KBjUsOKn2j Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 05 November 2003 1:46, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > This does not mean that I am principally against subpackages, but that > subpackages are indeed complex and probably need to wait for portage-ng > for support. > > Paul Won't this make dep/rev-dep checking an even more unlikely feature with=20 extended subpackages? =2D-=20 Chuck Brewer Registered Linux User #284015 Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred. --Boundary-02=_Cxeq/KBjUsOKn2j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/qexCGmszwkJY878RAlWiAKDltpDZMmNQl7K5xPsk6lHdedhrzwCgzu1J rubJIIt3doaDwO3yj0Z32s0= =YO9y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_Cxeq/KBjUsOKn2j--