From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23978 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Nov 2003 12:03:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 17274 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2003 12:03:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:03:02 +0100 From: Christian Birchinger To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20031105120302.GA10428@netswarm.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <3FA5AF6F.5030501@codewordt.co.uk> <200311032329.36696.gentoo@j-f.dk> <1067929724.5485.15.camel@carbon.internal.lan> <200311041103.12050.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20031104114926.GA8710@netswarm.net> <20031105114833.463cbcb0.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031105114833.463cbcb0.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Accepted-File-Formats: ASCII, .ps, .rtf, .pdf - *NO* Micosoft Office files please X-Info: No HTML mails please. text/plain is the official email format Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email) X-Archives-Salt: 55a987db-e25f-4390-a8de-9fd4b72d7adb X-Archives-Hash: dcc351a5a3ccf7b6ecc6a4341810671e I guess no one cares about the name as long as the feature is there. On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 11:48:33AM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:49:26 +0100 > Christian Birchinger wrote: > > > Yes, the same feature would be used to block installs into > > /usr/share/doc or /usr/share/info. I think we called it > > INSTALL_PROTECT in the previous discution about "noman" etc. > > I know a totaly different topic but could be done with the same > > portage feature. > > If you want you can try this patch: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32780 > > But sorry, I've called it "MERGE_EXCLUDE", because I've made the > first version of this patch before the consensus on the name, and was > too lazy to change it :) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list