From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20123 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Nov 2003 19:05:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19920 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 19:05:12 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:04:59 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20031104200459.4e733f51.genone@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <1067924966.23466.10.camel@localhost> References: <3FA5AF6F.5030501@codewordt.co.uk> <87k76hzboq.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <1067884835.23466.2.camel@localhost> <200311031348.00226.vapier@gentoo.org> <1067924966.23466.10.camel@localhost> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: H@&[wkk?l:Zx:8i_5bViK&{Vz{c{~r),^&:v/r#+X5dmfA6qCl)~'Ul{"&06Q1[05.%v&c>je5R{=xLnx^=~lN~rO0xuR~~NY)CX\"Nc4$9CBPwDl-.pYuVeGdir86L@\:j?7@%Ej2?Wi-Y0=1]T14ce0w79Bckk[*ti{;iA"{;I}&E~.msRBsBS)N!CS4Gd|_UR Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__4_Nov_2003_20_04_59_+0100_M_mPWT8H4kqsKC_H" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email) X-Archives-Salt: 865886b1-eaa1-459e-92f3-3e9cdba55649 X-Archives-Hash: 4fbc6a20aae3393856d8315ef3c673a4 --Signature=_Tue__4_Nov_2003_20_04_59_+0100_M_mPWT8H4kqsKC_H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/04/03 Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:47, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads > > (specifically the one where the id/EULA violation was originally > > discussed) and can be found in a semi-old bug: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17367 > > if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then > > you'd be wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ... > > -mike > > I have ACCEPT_LICENSE="SAVAGE" in make.conf, and emerge savagedemo > does not show a license or force me to agree to anything. Thus I would > say the lack of interactivity is preserved and there is indeed code > behind it, unless some other force I'm unaware of is at work. There is some code in the eutils eclass, but nothing in portage itself. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Signature=_Tue__4_Nov_2003_20_04_59_+0100_M_mPWT8H4kqsKC_H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/p/heWzrL1pM7SNcRAjAlAJ43NPEdRHU3g+GfrmDcg9mQDX7heACeN10r 2+lNSXIg51TeMloeGyECczg= =Ro2O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__4_Nov_2003_20_04_59_+0100_M_mPWT8H4kqsKC_H--