On 11/04/03  Donnie Berkholz wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 13:47, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads
> > (specifically the one where the id/EULA violation was originally
> > discussed) and can be found in a semi-old bug:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17367
> > if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then
> > you'd be wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ...
> > -mike
> 
> I have ACCEPT_LICENSE="SAVAGE" in make.conf, and emerge savagedemo
> does not show a license or force me to agree to anything. Thus I would
> say the lack of interactivity is preserved and there is indeed code
> behind it, unless some other force I'm unaware of is at work.

There is some code in the eutils eclass, but nothing in portage itself.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.