From: Donny Davies <woodchip@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:55:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031104185544.GA14900@breccia.escarpment> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031104183748.GA1055@cerberus.oppresses.us>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 778 bytes --]
Sorry about the messed up Reply-To on this one. Slip of the D key.
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:23:58PM -0500, John Davis wrote:
> To avoid over-complication, why don't we just separate the client and
> server ebuilds completely? (eg, samba-server, samba-client, etc)? I
> think woodchip pounced all over this one, but why avoid the most simple
> and elegant solution?
That's not going to happen. Not as long as I am maintaining SAMBA :-)
Separate ebuilds is not clean. Overloading USE flags is also way off
base; they are not meant to designate subpackages.
Unless subpackages are supported by Portage in some official fashion,
I'm not playing ball. That's really what the people are asking for.
So, design subpackages support. Then the ebuilds can be changed.
Donny
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 23:20 [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags Marius Mauch
2003-11-03 23:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-11-04 1:17 ` Jason Wever
2003-11-04 5:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-11-03 23:58 ` Philippe Coulonges
2003-11-04 0:03 ` Troy Dack
2003-11-04 0:17 ` Donny Davies
2003-11-04 0:42 ` Jason Rhinelander
2003-11-04 1:18 ` Marius Mauch
2003-11-04 3:30 ` Matthieu Sozeau
2003-11-04 1:00 ` Marius Mauch
2003-11-04 10:50 ` Mike Williams
2003-11-04 14:38 ` William Hubbs
2003-11-04 19:57 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Rocks My Socks Stroller
2003-11-04 1:04 ` [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags Luke-Jr
2003-11-04 9:14 ` Matthew Kennedy
2003-11-04 10:48 ` Heiko Vogel
2003-11-04 18:10 ` Bob Miller
2003-11-04 18:23 ` John Davis
2003-11-04 18:37 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-11-04 18:55 ` Donny Davies [this message]
2003-11-05 1:24 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-11-05 1:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-11-05 2:01 ` Chris Smith
2003-11-05 2:33 ` Luke-Jr
2003-11-05 2:23 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-11-05 9:46 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-11-05 10:03 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-11-06 6:37 ` C. Brewer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031104185544.GA14900@breccia.escarpment \
--to=woodchip@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox