From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28971 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Nov 2003 01:15:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10128 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 01:15:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:17:05 -0500 From: Jason Wever To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20031103201705.1df724b3.weeve@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3FA6EB06.2060801@technaut.darktalker.net> References: <20031104002017.71d91fc0.genone@gentoo.org> <3FA6EB06.2060801@technaut.darktalker.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__3_Nov_2003_20_17_05_-0500_AUEydjRacXe+z=B." Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags X-Archives-Salt: d551783e-0aca-41da-90c9-a82cf9c78986 X-Archives-Hash: af5a23579adf14dfa2ff4c8ee023bb58 --Signature=_Mon__3_Nov_2003_20_17_05_-0500_AUEydjRacXe+z=B. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:55:50 -0600 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > I think that it has the potential to work. The problem is that if > someone were to emerge a package with USE="client -server" and then they > decide they want the server part, they have to re-emerge the entire > package. Not too big of an issue, but an issue nonetheless. This could also require additional dependency checking logic in portage. Example; Package A has the proposed client/server capability. I choose to build package A as a client. I then choose to build package B, which depends on package A. However, a library/header/etc normally provided by package A isn't included with-server+client set in my USE variable. Portage would have to be able to check to see how package A was compiled and force a re-compilation of package A to satisfy package B. This also would violate the USE flags I've setup in make.conf (don't know if this happens already or not). Just something to consider. I'm not overly partial one way or another. -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead --Signature=_Mon__3_Nov_2003_20_17_05_-0500_AUEydjRacXe+z=B. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/pv4RdKvgdVioq28RAjA9AJ9SmbJTSTFgY1rdWL7g9zIKR/D4GACcCDgL jh2D0esLVdHi5c+MPvEwAWI= =YHmT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__3_Nov_2003_20_17_05_-0500_AUEydjRacXe+z=B.--