From: Jason Wever <weeve@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:17:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031103201705.1df724b3.weeve@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FA6EB06.2060801@technaut.darktalker.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 17:55:50 -0600
Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@technaut.darktalker.net> wrote:
> I think that it has the potential to work. The problem is that if
> someone were to emerge a package with USE="client -server" and then they
> decide they want the server part, they have to re-emerge the entire
> package. Not too big of an issue, but an issue nonetheless.
This could also require additional dependency checking logic in portage.
Example;
Package A has the proposed client/server capability. I choose to build
package A as a client. I then choose to build package B, which depends on
package A. However, a library/header/etc normally provided by package A
isn't included with-server+client set in my USE variable.
Portage would have to be able to check to see how package A was compiled
and force a re-compilation of package A to satisfy package B. This also
would violate the USE flags I've setup in make.conf (don't know if this
happens already or not).
Just something to consider. I'm not overly partial one way or another.
--
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-04 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-03 23:20 [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags Marius Mauch
2003-11-03 23:55 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-11-04 1:17 ` Jason Wever [this message]
2003-11-04 5:54 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-11-03 23:58 ` Philippe Coulonges
2003-11-04 0:03 ` Troy Dack
2003-11-04 0:17 ` Donny Davies
2003-11-04 0:42 ` Jason Rhinelander
2003-11-04 1:18 ` Marius Mauch
2003-11-04 3:30 ` Matthieu Sozeau
2003-11-04 1:00 ` Marius Mauch
2003-11-04 10:50 ` Mike Williams
2003-11-04 14:38 ` William Hubbs
2003-11-04 19:57 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Rocks My Socks Stroller
2003-11-04 1:04 ` [gentoo-dev] [IMPORTANT] server/client USE flags Luke-Jr
2003-11-04 9:14 ` Matthew Kennedy
2003-11-04 10:48 ` Heiko Vogel
2003-11-04 18:10 ` Bob Miller
2003-11-04 18:23 ` John Davis
2003-11-04 18:37 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-11-04 18:55 ` Donny Davies
2003-11-05 1:24 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-11-05 1:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-11-05 2:01 ` Chris Smith
2003-11-05 2:33 ` Luke-Jr
2003-11-05 2:23 ` Terje Kvernes
2003-11-05 9:46 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-11-05 10:03 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-11-06 6:37 ` C. Brewer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031103201705.1df724b3.weeve@gentoo.org \
--to=weeve@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox