From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12150 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Nov 2003 17:59:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 29963 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 17:59:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:57:51 -0800 From: david@futuretel.com To: Andrew Gaffney Cc: Gentoo Dev Message-ID: <20031103175751.GB7754@redhate.futuretel.com> References: <1067741735.4138.17.camel@chris.pebenito.net> <3FA4B75B.5090107@technaut.darktalker.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FA4B75B.5090107@technaut.darktalker.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Embedded Gentoo X-Archives-Salt: 9e8f9ba2-039c-471d-a959-d88692b69325 X-Archives-Hash: 29d5555df49479e655f2cec12852ca1e On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:50:51AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Seemless cross-compiler distcc support in portage. > I second that. Although seemless cross-compilation would be a good first step ;-) what's needed by portage for this type of a thing to work ? Lots of re-design ? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list