From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26273 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Nov 2003 18:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 24803 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 18:47:13 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 13:47:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <3FA5AF6F.5030501@codewordt.co.uk> <87k76hzboq.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <1067884835.23466.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1067884835.23466.2.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_gLqp/ms2NX1M4b1"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311031348.00226.vapier@gentoo.org> X-PMX-Version: 4.1.0.80455 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email) X-Archives-Salt: dbb05eaf-2b16-4f73-9b34-8ce77de58ecd X-Archives-Hash: 9ea18196dbbbf91aa2cd97e298261214 --Boundary-02=_gLqp/ms2NX1M4b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 03 November 2003 13:40, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:58, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > > Dhruba Bandopadhyay writes: > > > if absolutely necessary. It's a shame that finally EULA's have > > > made ebuilds interactive and sound and message waits are further > > > increasing merge time > > > > Damn proprietary software!!! > > I'm a little surprised nobody has pointed out the ACCEPT_LICENSE > variable in make.conf yet. umm ACCEPT_LICENSE has been pointed out in other threads (specifically the = one=20 where the id/EULA violation was originally discussed) and can be found in a= =20 semi-old bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17367 if you mean to say that the variable actually does something, then you'd be= =20 wrong ... there is no code behind that variable atm ... =2Dmike --Boundary-02=_gLqp/ms2NX1M4b1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAP6ai30FjO5/oN/WBAQLbtBAAhK/kTWvCXrJ1BAs3Ws6f1XaAwRpCyK/P IZQpnnhNSl1NfYusNkQXs9OqMM8jcu5aszIrg5lWnovkq1xCEJpWQDLEmcq68bQT KVUUQkVq6XbsDXhZ6Bpm+idJmVvYlTT3BCKEdimjrqj6JFa8YftDbXIeWcqkjHIi GCS8mHzJA2kM+QxAf7CS5b+j8Ul7l9n6UAcGxbPCtEdH7P8chZcMgUi+Lsg9kEjW /yMQb+6mJqrbHjdf40pgOaIHGDdEpnvsUvyhInhVF4q3g/KlVnKI/YoliUQZsGbw QetjZZrXO31lnc54PL0CWHVHO0URlw/eWZF7VC6f4cC/iQ9DkvijIRNj4yM+9EUc i/xeZusSgRF4AlGwycGA/g0e/uoBlvHjbyUuwLVqMGKeCmBQi8L6WHgByVgCE3rK qSgayOIoYK9CPvi1nZajT99fUc8iA7SNX8/HdemQ0hXEDmFo6D+vaxEL3P0hRPBQ U+gciYzQu/5VhYbrwHW5TcNSaRRc8MZppT0Vg2jSVQzKxfwoeU2vM3sSe3gj+p/5 1RF0bRSR4TYhReRn8mTT5dmaKqpsbLb7TzVQPC3JUWoQei79h51j+rkxjtv0+qxm WzjUcC2Ny+Q+RDhdylVZM49Ct+9vIeKMbLUUIucplA2Ebgt1NQ4oXceqwjqx7Eq6 BRTXTkvV2LM= =oyR1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_gLqp/ms2NX1M4b1--