From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16715 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Nov 2003 10:07:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27320 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 10:07:46 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:11:56 +0100 From: Antonio Dolcetta To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20031103111156.717c6ad3.adolcetta@infracom.it> In-Reply-To: <1128.134.188.150.80.1067852232.squirrel@callisto.cs.kun.nl> References: <3FA5AF6F.5030501@codewordt.co.uk> <1067849092.3305.12.camel@localhost> <1128.134.188.150.80.1067852232.squirrel@callisto.cs.kun.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email) X-Archives-Salt: e6168125-fb13-4812-b231-ee3e6a76ac29 X-Archives-Hash: 513cf37a37ed039fd4622d004325ff5c On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:37:12 +0100 (CET) "Paul de Vrieze" wrote: > I agree with you. As a temporary solution to the beep problem you might > consider using "emerge bla &>/tmp/bla.log&", which aditionally gives you a > log so you can more easilly debug issues. > Even better, use script(1) Ciao Antonio -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list