From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25778 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Nov 2003 03:45:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9306 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2003 03:45:28 -0000 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:45:26 -0500 From: Jon Portnoy To: "C. Brewer" Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20031103034526.GA687@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <3FA5AF6F.5030501@codewordt.co.uk> <200311031519.15319.chris.rs@xtra.co.nz> <200311021933.19998.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200311021933.19998.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email) X-Archives-Salt: fc191736-66d5-474f-95b5-5fe054767b39 X-Archives-Hash: 23a2f8bcc33587c437a65e58610e32eb On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:33:10PM -0800, C. Brewer wrote: Content-Description: signed data > Is it me, or does it seem like when there are less than popular suggestions, > there are often more nasty replies or flame-tinted repsonses from the > developers, or am I just overly sensitive? I can put a "Opinions are my own and not those of Gentoo Linux or any other entity unless stated otherwise" disclaimer in my sig like I do on the forums if it's necessary. -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list