Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla behaviour in Gentoo Linux (long email)

["C. Brewer" <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1166 bytes --]

On Sunday 02 November 2003 7:45, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:33:10PM -0800, C. Brewer wrote:
> Content-Description: signed data
>
> >  Is it me, or does it seem like when there are less than popular
> > suggestions, there are often more nasty replies or flame-tinted repsonses
> > from the developers, or am I just overly sensitive?
>
> I can put a "Opinions are my own and not those of Gentoo Linux or any
> other entity unless stated otherwise" disclaimer in my sig like I do on
> the forums if it's necessary.

Being not the first time I've heard something along these lines, forgive me if 
I am slightly skeptical. Opinions are your own, regardless of if they 
coincide with Gentoo's. But as a person who is entitled to any opinion, nasty 
or otherwise, while yet still at least partly responsible for steering the 
distibution... where does the line get drawn? Do we take nasty responses as 
merely personal opinion until a required number of devs have a similar view 
on it, and then it's official?
-- 
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.



[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]