From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17502 invoked by uid 1002); 29 Oct 2003 12:16:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 21804 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2003 12:16:35 -0000 X-WM-Posted-At: mailandnews.com; Wed, 29 Oct 03 07:16:35 -0500 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:16:30 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20031027042839.GC28917@digitasaru.net> <87ekwzdw73.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <200310270756.59051.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200310270756.59051.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310292116.30598.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] NPTL ready yet? X-Archives-Salt: 45b2b50c-b1ba-4e23-9206-eb57489d2d90 X-Archives-Hash: b85975b909d522a406018ad49e7adea9 I used NPTL for about four weeks and had no problems except that canna, a Japanese input server, would not start. Other than that, I didn't detect any change in the system, performance-wise or otherwise. On Monday 27 October 2003 21:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 01:35, Matthew Kennedy wrote: > > Whats involved in updating a non-NPTL glibc to NPTL glibc? Just > > "USE=nptl emerge glibc" or do other libraries and binaries need to be > > re-emerged also? > > no, just re-emerging glibc with nptl in USE is enough As far as I know, only OpenOffice and Sun JRE/JDK have support for NPTL. Wouldn't these need to be re-emerged to take advantage of it? Regards, Jason -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list