From: <jtoyota@bellsouth.net>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:03:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031028230326.ZJL1780.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net> (raw)
ok i'm new to both linux and gentoo. so plz don't flame me. yet, in order to get rid of gcc and portage why not compile or write a self-compile/extract thing-a-ma-jig (pre-build) the packages desired. does this defeat your goal?
-josh
============================================================
From: Vano D <gentoo-dev@europeansoftware.com>
Date: 2003/10/28 Tue AM 11:24:12 EST
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 10:10, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> You could bind mount the portage tree into the root system (of course
> updates will be out of the question). After you're done unmerge portage
> and it works.
[Still not used to the reply-to. Now off to the list. Paul already has a
copy of my email before anyone else (lucky you ;)]
This is very interesting. Such a simple idea. Anyhow I have also been
looking at ways to get rid of portage/gcc/dev tools out of Gentoo. But
my goal has been to clean the system of dev tools and thus portage
(since it would be useless without dev tools) so as to create server
installations. (Although I also have had a side interest in getting a
knoppix-like system built solely out of gentoo.)
I wonder if it would be possible to somehow remotely "mount" the rest of
the stuff such as gcc/python etc.. as with portage. So this way the
system would be completely clean and when it needs to be updated a
script would mount/link the tools from a remote system and after its
done upgrading it would unlink and we are left with a lean clean system.
Any thoughts on this?
PD. I already have attempted at removing gcc and whatnot from Gentoo but
have ended up with a nonbootable system. I would really appreciate if
anyone who has had success in doing this would shed some light and give
some tips.
Cheers,
Vano.
--
Vano D <gentoo-dev@europeansoftware.com>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
============================================================
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 23:03 jtoyota [this message]
2003-10-28 23:38 ` Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded Dejan Nikic
2003-10-29 0:01 ` [gentoo-dev] 'submerge' was " david
2003-10-29 19:46 ` Ned Ludd
2003-10-31 7:07 ` luke
2003-10-31 8:53 ` luke
2003-10-31 19:47 ` david
2003-11-03 3:18 ` luke
2003-11-03 3:20 ` luke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031028230326.ZJL1780.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@mail.bellsouth.net \
--to=jtoyota@bellsouth.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox