From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17772 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Oct 2003 09:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22626 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2003 09:16:07 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:16:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200310271004.46293.nbensa@gmx.net> <1067315701.9405.29.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200310272145.16008.matt@legalizefreedom.org> In-Reply-To: <200310272145.16008.matt@legalizefreedom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310281016.06538.pauldv@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.3.2-r[68] libpthread -> segmentation fault X-Archives-Salt: 0a1f4f51-7326-404c-b5ab-60262b7629b0 X-Archives-Hash: 3d2262f190ba07a696e9e1af37c92f09 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 28 October 2003 06:45, Matt Chorman wrote: > On Monday 27 October 2003 08:35 pm, you wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 06:21, Matt Chorman wrote: > > > On Monday 27 October 2003 08:09 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 01:46, Matt Chorman wrote: > > > > > My experience with ntpl has been exaclty like this - even > > > > > downgrading did not help. Try recompiling glibc WITHOUT > > > > > use=3Dntpl. Your binaries will (should?) start to work again. > > > > > Mine did.... > > > > > > > > What CPU is in this box ? > > > > > > This is running an AthlonXP 2000+.. Ye Olde AMD chips... ;-) > > > > What gcc/binutils ? > > I initially tried with gcc 3.3.1-r5, binutils 2.14.90.0.6-r6, glibc > 2.3.2-r6. After seeing the thread on the stability of nptl this AM I > decided to try re-emerging glibc with USE=3Dnptl (famous last words). I > sync'd and emerge'd glibc-2.3.2-r8 (with nptl). I dropped out of X and > went to get back in when I started getting segfaults. I decided to > bump gcc to 3.3.2-r1 and binutils to 2.14.90.0.6-r7 (with the new > glibc). I was still getting segfaults, so I emerged glibc with the new > gcc/binutils and the segfaults were still there. Tried again by going > back to glibc-2.3.2-r7 (with nptl) - no joy. I removed nptl from the > use flags, re-emerged glibc-2.3.2-r8 and voila, everything is back to > normal. In the process, I did try to recompile xfree but there was no > change. I also use prelink - so somewhere during this process I ran a > prelink -ua but still had segfaults. > > Is there a bug open for this that I should be posting at? Need any > more info? I guess you did run an nptl enabled kernel? Paul =2D --=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/njPWbKx5DBjWFdsRAhL2AJ9K4/hjhC7QwFF7lZHrE/YQ5E6GhgCgg0Bx RaF4IJc0ZaVQPQhw+f1+7s0=3D =3DABWl =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list