public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Gretencord <arutha@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:47:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310201547.50607.arutha@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1066617251.991.5.camel@sfa237013.richmond.edu>

On Monday 20 October 2003 04:34, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> This means that if a user emerges xfree when linked to a 2.4 kernel,
> that user will need to remerge xfree after moving to 2.6 kernels. This
> takes about 40 minutes on a ~2GHz x86.

Well 40 minutes on 2GHz ist a lot more time on a 1GHz system. I recently built 
gentoo on my laptop (1.1GHz) and it took more than 12 hours for (not all of) 
kde. With X and gcc and whatnot it would have been quite more. Of course 
every package only adds an hour or two but it still sums up. I merged gtk+ 
with -O just to avoid upgrading to xfree-4.3.0-r3 and even that took quite 
some time.

> 1) Is this acceptable?
> 2) If not, what is a better solution? Dropping the patch entirely? Note
> that I don't know Mesa/programming well enough to write a patch
> compatible for both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.

At least don't put the reason for this into a postinst notice. I'd hate to 
merge a new xfree, just to see a notice (after hours of compiling) about 
breakage. If you break something, tell me _before_ I merge the package.


Alex


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-20 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-20  2:34 [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20  3:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  3:18   ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20  3:22   ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20  4:04     ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  4:30       ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20  3:20 ` Brandon Hale
2003-10-20  3:25   ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20  4:32     ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  4:16   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  3:38     ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-20  4:25     ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-20  4:33 ` Kumba
2003-10-20  4:59   ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-19 23:48     ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20  7:13       ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  0:30         ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20  5:15     ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  5:23       ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 13:47 ` Alexander Gretencord [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200310201547.50607.arutha@gmx.de \
    --to=arutha@gmx.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox