Re: [gentoo-dev] Stupid question regarding 'fixpackages'

[Marius Mauch <genone@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1209 bytes --]

On 10/20/03  Joachim Breuer wrote:

> Now, my question is: Shouldn't fixpackages 'stabilize', i.e. not
> perform global updates it has already performed? The way it is now I'd
> hate to think what an upgrade will be like a year or two from now...
> If this 'stabilizing' cannot be done I'd like to know for what reason,
> perhaps I'd want to take a look whether there really isn't an useful
> optimization.

Well, there are different opinions on that. I'd like to make the
fixpackages script behave the same way as FEATURES="fixpackages", but
there is a reason not to do this: the do_upgrade function which actually
does all the work for fixpackages (and more) maintains a mtime table
when it runs, but it is run by emerge and fixpackages. The problem now
is that when do_upgrade runs from emerge without FEATURES="fixpackages"
it updates the mtime table, that means the information would be wrong
for fixpackages. I guess in the end we will have to add another mtime
table for fixpackages to fix this issue.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]