From: Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:38:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310201238.30424.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310200416.14653.luke-jr@gentoo.org>
On Monday 20 October 2003 13:16, Luke-Jr wrote:
> I was thinking that once 2.6.0 was final, the kernel people would
> (hopefully) release a gentoo-sources using 2.6 in unstable... If this is
> not the case, would anyone mind if love-sources were to be added to the
> portage tree or is there any reason not to?
love-sources is the work of two people who both have fairly little time to
devote to the numerous bug reports coming from the relatively small number of
users using it. If it were added to portage (even if it was masked in
packages.mask) the number of bug reports would be ridiculous. I suggest that
it should not be added unless it becomes more than just a hobby for the
maintainers.
Regards,
Jason
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 2:34 [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 3:18 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:22 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 4:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 4:30 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:20 ` Brandon Hale
2003-10-20 3:25 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 4:32 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 4:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 3:38 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2003-10-20 4:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-20 4:33 ` Kumba
2003-10-20 4:59 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-19 23:48 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20 7:13 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 0:30 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20 5:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 5:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 13:47 ` Alexander Gretencord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310201238.30424.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--to=jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox