From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: "C. Brewer" <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] db questions
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 00:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031020071009.GA19061@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310192351.34227.cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1312 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:51:33PM +0000, C. Brewer wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> I recently noticed I have 5 versions of db installed now (~x86), and
> my question is this: since qpkg is lying to me and says I need them
> all and the ebuilds say different, what versions are actually required
> now, and is there any chance that we'll get to just one in the
> future?:)
It's highly unlikely that we will get the point where we will need only
one.
I don't know where you get five versions however, this is what most
machines will end up with over time (these are also the 4 slots):
sys-libs/db-1*
sys-libs/db-3*
sys-libs/db-4.0*
sys-libs/db-4.1*
The reasoning behind this is repeated API changes have lead programs to
specificly link against some version, or come up with fancy macros
(which break often) to try and work with lots of them.
The major problem with the API changes is changes in the order and
number of parameters of some function calls.
There are programs in portage that specificly look for all of
those slotted variants.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@orbis-terrarum.net
Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-19 23:51 [gentoo-dev] db questions C. Brewer
2003-10-20 7:10 ` Robin H. Johnson [this message]
2003-10-20 0:25 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20 11:00 ` Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031020071009.GA19061@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net \
--to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
--cc=cbrewer@stealthaccess.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox