From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Cc: Brandon Hale <tseng@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 04:16:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310200416.14653.luke-jr@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031020032034.GA29403@emu.gentoo.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 20 October 2003 03:20 am, Brandon Hale wrote:
> It appears that the larger part of our user base is running a 2.4 series
> kernel, and will be for quite some time. Considering this, and our position
> that testing kernels are not offically supported, I think we should give
> priority to fixing bugs that affect the most users.
I was thinking that once 2.6.0 was final, the kernel people would (hopefully)
release a gentoo-sources using 2.6 in unstable... If this is not the case,
would anyone mind if love-sources were to be added to the portage tree or is
there any reason not to?
- --
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/k2GMZl/BHdU+lYMRAow0AJ4qOy2QdLiSGBAHK/MbNw0qm1on4wCdG5lS
vDFXTcyyDWNgYx2LJ2EaxPM=
=1x5y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 2:34 [gentoo-dev] Patches and the 2.4->2.6 move Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 3:18 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:22 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 4:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 4:30 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 3:20 ` Brandon Hale
2003-10-20 3:25 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 4:32 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 4:16 ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2003-10-20 3:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-20 4:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-20 4:33 ` Kumba
2003-10-20 4:59 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-19 23:48 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20 7:13 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 0:30 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-20 5:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20 5:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-20 13:47 ` Alexander Gretencord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310200416.14653.luke-jr@gentoo.org \
--to=luke-jr@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=tseng@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox