public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corvus Corax <corvus-ml@cybertrench.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory ebuild
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:31:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031019153105.50b63529.corvus-ml@cybertrench.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1066483836.28203.13.camel@localhost>

Am Sat, 18 Oct 2003 09:30:36 -0400
schrieb Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>:

> I want to ask the opinion of everyone.  I updated Enemy-Territory
> yesterday to close two bugs.  In doing so, I made the decision to make
> the newest version of Enemy Territory use the new full download.  I have
> had requests from people to have the full download, rather than the
> original download + patches, as the ebuild.
> 
> Well, I am thinking of breaking up the enemy-territory ebuilds into two
> ebuilds.  There would be an enemy-territory ebuild, which would use the
> original download + patches (and therefore be dial-up friendly) and the
> enemy-territory-full ebuild, which would always download and install the
> complete game from the most recent version.  This should satisfy both
> camps and also make the ebuild a bit more dial-up friendly.
> 
> Thoughts? Opinions? Flames?
> 
> -- 
> Chris Gianelloni
> Developer, Gentoo Linux
> Games Team
> 
> Is your power animal a penguin?
> 

I'd say, pack it into one ebuild and make it intelligent, some check like
"if an old tar.gz is already installed, download just the needed patches and patch,
but if it has to be downloaded anyway, download the newer "full" installation"
that saves the users from having to download both,
for example when installing the original .56 yesterday
and upgrading from .56 to .56-r1 today (grrrrr)

Corvus

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-19 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-18 13:30 [gentoo-dev] Enemy Territory ebuild Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-18 18:13 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
2003-10-18 19:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Matt Thrailkill
2003-10-18 21:53   ` Mike Frysinger
2003-10-19  0:08   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-20  7:48     ` Matt Thrailkill
2003-10-18 19:39 ` Stroller
2003-10-19 13:31 ` Corvus Corax [this message]
2003-10-19 14:01   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-20  6:06     ` Mike Frysinger
     [not found] ` <B6AD5486-01A2-11D8-A06D-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
2003-10-19 13:52   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-10-21 12:39 ` Dhruba Bandopadhyay
2003-10-21 13:15   ` Chris Gianelloni
     [not found]     ` <893C9795-03ED-11D8-AF70-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
2003-10-21 20:23       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Use of USE flags..? Was: " Chris Gianelloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031019153105.50b63529.corvus-ml@cybertrench.com \
    --to=corvus-ml@cybertrench.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox