[gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Patrick Lauer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 990 bytes --]

Hi,

while doing an emerge -U world the compilation of xine-lib stopped:
 
* Please uninstall older xine libraries.
* The compilation cannot procede.


This can also be found as Bug 19409. (WONTFIX)
So an emerge -U world will NOT complete. Also, xine-lib-0.9.13-r3 
is installed as dependency of pornview, the next emerge -U or 
installation of xine-ui will try to install xine-lib-1-beta12 
(which will not complete). 

So:
* pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)
* Xine-ui can not be installed without emerge -C
* emerge -U functionality is broken when xine-lib is installed.

1) How did this slip through QA?
2) What is the official policy on breaking emerge -U ? I thought that's a big no-no?
3) Why is a bug that I'd consider a BLOCKER only WONTFIX ?

I hope nobody feels flamed, but this behaviour has existed for some time, and it's 
not what a normal user would want to work around. I unmerged xine-lib a few times 
because that's the easiest workaround !?


Patrick Lauer





[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1307 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Andrew Gaffney]

Patrick Lauer wrote:
> * pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)

Somebody has no shame ;)

-- 
Andrew Gaffney


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[C. Brewer]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 353 bytes --]

On Friday 17 October 2003 7:05, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > * pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)
>
> Somebody has no shame ;)

Don't let the name fool ya, it's got other productive uses as well.
-- 
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.



[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Andrew Gaffney]

C. Brewer wrote:
> On Friday 17 October 2003 7:05, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> 
>>Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>
>>>* pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)
>>
>>Somebody has no shame ;)
> 
> 
> Don't let the name fool ya, it's got other productive uses as well.

I'm well aware of that. I use it myself....for other productive uses :)

-- 
Andrew Gaffney


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Horror Vacui]

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 21:29:37 -0500
Andrew wrote:

> C. Brewer wrote:
> > On Friday 17 October 2003 7:05, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > 
> >>Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >>
> >>>* pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)
> >>
> >>Somebody has no shame ;)
> > 
> > 
> > Don't let the name fool ya, it's got other productive uses as well.
> 
> I'm well aware of that. I use it myself....for other productive uses
> :)

Didn't you mean "reproductive"???

Cheers

-- 
Horror Vacui

Registered Linux user #257714

Go get yourself... counted: http://counter.li.org/
- and keep following the GNU.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Peter Ruskin]

On Saturday 18 Oct 2003 03:29, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> C. Brewer wrote:
> > On Friday 17 October 2003 7:05, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> >>Patrick Lauer wrote:
> >>>* pornview does not work (xine-lib problems)
> >>
> >>Somebody has no shame ;)
> >
> > Don't let the name fool ya, it's got other productive uses as well.
>
> I'm well aware of that. I use it myself....for other productive uses
> :)

Me too, it's an excellent viewer.  0.2.0_pre1 works fine with 
xine-lib-1_beta12.

Peter
-- 
======================================================================
Portage 2.0.49-r13 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1, 
2.4.23_pre7-gss)
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+
======================================================================


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Paul de Vrieze]

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 662 bytes --]

On Friday 17 October 2003 19:20, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> 1) How did this slip through QA?
> 2) What is the official policy on breaking emerge -U ? I thought that's a
> big no-no? 3) Why is a bug that I'd consider a BLOCKER only WONTFIX ?

Unfortunately there are packages that have issues with existing libs. Parts of 
that are caused by libtool and can often be fixed by the libtool.eclass 
elibtoolize function. I don't know why xine-lib blocks, and I believe that a 
fix would be wanted, but in some cases such a thing is the only option.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

AW: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib

[Martin Holzer]

I've changed SLOT.

This a little bit better


Martin Holzer
sVrmARTY-/irc.freenode.net

Bug-Wrangler, Gentoo Linux
 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Paul de Vrieze [mailto:pauldv@gentoo.org] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Oktober 2003 21:30
An: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] xine-lib


On Friday 17 October 2003 19:20, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> 1) How did this slip through QA?
> 2) What is the official policy on breaking emerge -U ? I thought 
> that's a big no-no? 3) Why is a bug that I'd consider a BLOCKER only 
> WONTFIX ?

Unfortunately there are packages that have issues with existing libs. Parts
of 
that are caused by libtool and can often be fixed by the libtool.eclass 
elibtoolize function. I don't know why xine-lib blocks, and I believe that a

fix would be wanted, but in some cases such a thing is the only option.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list