From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1435 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Oct 2003 07:42:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15750 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 07:42:48 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:42:45 +0200 From: Spider To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20031014094245.76155185.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20031014091507.035e01d2.cphil@cphil.net> References: <20031014003652.76a39229.cphil@cphil.net> <3F8B43A7.70704@aravir.net> <20031014091507.035e01d2.cphil@cphil.net> Organization: Chaotic X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.rXWyG/LUAUXzpb" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of nautilus X-Archives-Salt: ca5c96e5-e1bd-4d08-ad22-aa21ed25b5ba X-Archives-Hash: 64fe8ba88f590c8c5f79072560430a1c --=.rXWyG/LUAUXzpb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit begin quote On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 09:15:07 +0200 Philippe Coulonges wrote: > I use a slightly different method. > I change the type in gnome-session to trash, then I destroy nautilus > and save my session. > > > Without that necessity, at least on my system, Nautilus never loads > > unless you order it to explicitly. > > It doesn't load, but I still have to compile frequently a big program > I don't use. And as I can see my machine ain't broke without it, I > would like to know what exactly cause the dependence. > > Maybe there's some good in the Debian "suggested" package type > of dependencies. > Maybe you shouldn't ask for a complete gnome installation? since you don't -want- all of gnome, dont install it. install the parts you want and go ahead. if something brings in nautilus and youre deadly afraid of installing nautilus, perhaps try injecting nautilus, and check what the package thinks about it. if you want us to remove a dep on nautilus you'll have to prove that there aren't any binary differences between a package built with nautilus in the system, and one built without it. ( That is, no dissapearing functionality nor any dissapearing executables ) //Spider -- begin .signature This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature! See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information. end --=.rXWyG/LUAUXzpb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/i6j3ZS9CZTi033kRAoHmAJ9S9D7r5+Ggv8nR2pHW2pCWKwT4AQCgmjwZ /J0IjOVPDMg9mIli5yu9aZ8= =l1sW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.rXWyG/LUAUXzpb--