From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1708 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Oct 2003 20:30:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 15650 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2003 20:30:12 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:30:25 -0500 From: Kain To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20031013203025.GA18683@miyazaki> References: <200310130411.35520.nbensa@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310130411.35520.nbensa@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] bin86, why? X-Archives-Salt: 0ca9099d-14ab-4c18-83c0-bd4c2f5b40fd X-Archives-Hash: 1cdcd714a095c59b349f1d6cd60c2204 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 04:11:32AM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: Content-Description: signed data > Can bin86 be removed from system, or is there other packages still using= =20 > {as,ld}86? You still need bin86 at least for linux-2.2 kernels, I believe. --=20 Bryon Roche Professional {Developer,Guru,Mad Scientist} PGP Key Fingerprint: FE0D EC23 6464 726A CD54 48D3 04AD 86FE 6878 ABD5 Success, recognition, and conformity are the bywords of the modern world wh= ere everyone seems to crave the anesthetizing security of being identified with= the majority...Human salvation lies in the hands of the creatively maladjusted. -- Martin Luther King, Jr. --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/iwthBK2G/mh4q9URAhn3AJ9w5x+J+a3uxD7mO5NGLvCK9FXChgCfav/r aKh6QizqeoUP4YOzVmu1XtE= =vEBm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw--