From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-7267-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 18039 invoked by uid 1002); 6 Oct 2003 05:52:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 5404 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 05:52:50 -0000
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:52:49 -0700
From: Bob Miller <kbob@jogger-egg.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-ID: <20031006055249.GM22236@jogger-egg.com>
References: <1065416111.3958.94.camel@zen.mine.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1065416111.3958.94.camel@zen.mine.nu>
Organization: Unlikely
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GNOME 2.4 marked stable on x86
X-Archives-Salt: 1be8f24c-cf31-462c-a8c5-73c55ae46f6a
X-Archives-Hash: ad6e9a63ae4bd6afc5323c1b928cabb7

Mike Gardiner wrote:

> Those of you upgrading from 2.2 may however, run into several small
> problems, commonly heard on IRC and the forums these past few weeks as
> "Help!, my bonobo-activation is blocking gnome?". The reason for this,
> is that bonobo-activation has been merged into libbonobo in versions
> post-2.4.0. 

media-gfx/gtkam still depends on bonobo-activation.  Is gtkam
deprecated, or does its .ebuild file need a tweak?

-- 
Bob Miller                              K<bob>
kbobsoft software consulting
http://kbobsoft.com                     kbob@jogger-egg.com

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list