From: Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:47:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310052347.09049.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
On Sunday 05 October 2003 23:41, Sami Näätänen wrote:
> On Sunday 05 October 2003 14:30, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Sunday 05 October 2003 14:22, Kevyn Shortell wrote:
> > > I don't think anyone has an argument with making things easier, but
> > > we shouldn't make things easier for new users to the detriment of
> > > making things more difficult for everyone else. There is a point
> > > where Gentoo just might be more advanced than a new user is skill
> > > wise, and accept that.
> >
> > Nobody's talking about making things harder for everyone else.
> > "emerge linux-gentoo-src" as Luke-Jr suggested is detrimentally
> > difficult when compared to "emerge gentoo-sources" is it? 2 extra
> > keystrokes?! There are also many people saying that Gentoo might just
> > be too hard for lusers. Why then was genkernel created in the first
> > place?
>
> I'm certainly in favor of making the -src thing to active, because it
> really gives people the full power. For example I have some times
> wanted to look the code used in a package. I of course can simply untar
> the tarball somewhere, but if the package contains multiple tarballs I
> either has to find them, or start to ebuild package.ebuild unpack stuff
> and then move the source tree from the temp location to somewhere where
> it is not going to be overwriten. I although don't suggest that -src
> suffix, but an option to the emerge, which tells it to install this
> software to package's SLOT="$P-src", from which I then could be looking
> in $PORT_SRC_DIR/$P-src.
Agreed here. An option to emerge is much more intuitive.
> Oh and the kernel packages that would compile the kernel should install
> the kernel headers of the compiled kernel to
> /usr/src/linux-`uname -r`/include/
> so that any package that needs the real kernel headers can find them.
Er, I'm pretty sure that the packages that need the source in /usr/src/linux
need more than just the headers - but don't quote me on that!
Regards,
Jason
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-05 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 9:36 [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Brad Laue
2003-10-03 9:54 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 18:12 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 19:26 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 0:41 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04 2:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 3:50 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 15:34 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 16:23 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
[not found] ` <3F7DA0C3.3000303@gentoo.org>
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 17:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-03 23:50 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-03 23:58 ` Kurt Lieber
2003-10-04 0:01 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 2:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 0:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 3:56 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 4:29 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 12:40 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 13:10 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:51 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:15 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:36 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 15:09 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 17:20 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 17:58 ` Marius Mauch
2003-10-04 15:56 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 17:29 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 18:27 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 23:38 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 0:48 ` Patrick Börjesson
[not found] ` <200310050343.49697.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 1:52 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 2:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:33 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 14:08 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-04 14:21 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:14 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:50 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-10-04 13:50 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 13:57 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:13 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 17:25 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 23:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:17 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 0:25 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 0:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:48 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 2:10 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:27 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:06 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:44 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 4:54 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-05 5:28 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 0:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:43 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 3:04 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 14:24 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 5:22 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 11:30 ` Jason Stubbs
[not found] ` <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 14:47 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2003-10-05 15:53 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 16:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 6:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 6:34 ` Kumba
2003-10-04 7:27 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-04 13:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:03 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 2:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 4:08 ` Stroller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-05 18:24 Sami Näätänen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310052347.09049.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--to=jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox