From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2539 invoked by uid 1002); 5 Oct 2003 14:24:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20167 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2003 14:24:48 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: kumba@gentoo.org, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 14:24:34 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <3F7D4315.1020900@gentoo.org> <200310050244.05634.luke-jr@gentoo.org> <3F7F8A20.5090504@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3F7F8A20.5090504@gentoo.org> GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="shift_jis" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310051424.44054.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree X-Archives-Salt: 3e8a60cb-c823-4ff6-bd91-f0f30ea38d5d X-Archives-Hash: c1f50fae3045fc13f5d809c5f210353f =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 05 October 2003 03:04 am, Kumba wrote: > Luke-Jr wrote: > > Last I checked, these configs could be changed after it is compiled. If > > it is impossible to do, then how is it that RedHat and all the binary > > distros have a single kernel for x86? > > -mcpu=3Di[3456]86 -march=3Di[3456]86 + modules madness Isn't the CFLAGS variable in make.conf meant for -mcpu and -march? genkerne= l=20 already takes care of modules. =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/gCmlZl/BHdU+lYMRAiDIAJ9H4oo//y+kCSlpa6IDKEB15EhaUgCfe2vS 4u3sJOHR2L16nqLNDzEZHGI=3D =3Dvf9S =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list