From: Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 08:28:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310050828.34578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031004161307.GA2251@cerberus.oppresses.us>
On Sunday 05 October 2003 01:13, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 01:57:42PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Saturday 04 October 2003 01:50 pm, Patrick Börjesson wrote:
> > > I've always thought of genkernel as a tool for those not "competent"
> > > enough to compile the kernel by them selves... As such I don't think it
> > > should be something that is used by default but rather something that
> > > gets mentioned in the install-docs, and not forced on users.
> >
> > Compiling the kernel is quite simple: 'make bzImage modules'
> > I believe you mean configuring, which genkernel still lets you do.
> > Also, as I said, there could be a -src suffix to install the source. For
> > example, what about people who would consider themselves "competent"
> > enough to compile GCC or KDE themselves? =p
>
> Every dev and user who has responded has said it's a Very Bad Idea. Why
> are you still arguing for it?
Ahem?
I think the main point to the discussion is new users. I, too, have never used
genkernel so don't know how viable the idea of using it in its current state
would be. Nor am I admonishing that it should be the "only way to go".
However, everything in Gentoo is configured, compiled and installed through
the single emerge command. It would make most sense to me to choose what
classes of drivers/functionality I wanted through USE flags and then do
post-installation configuration through /etc/modules.autoload*. Can anyone
say why the kernel is special and should be done differently? - other than if
it ain't broke don't fix it!
I'm with almost all other people in that it would not be a high priority for
some time to come. On the other hand, I'm against people who are putting
forward arguments that the kernel is somehow special. Almost every other
package is installed with extra cruft so that can't be used as an excuse.
Gentoo is about making things easier for everyone which means safe defaults
and easily accessible complete customisation, so Luke-Jr's idea at least
deserves consideration rather than instant dismissal.
Jason
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-04 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 9:36 [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Brad Laue
2003-10-03 9:54 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 18:12 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 19:26 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 0:41 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04 2:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 3:50 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 15:34 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 16:23 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
[not found] ` <3F7DA0C3.3000303@gentoo.org>
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 17:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-03 23:50 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-03 23:58 ` Kurt Lieber
2003-10-04 0:01 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 2:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 0:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 3:56 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 4:29 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 12:40 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 13:10 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:51 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:15 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:36 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 15:09 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 17:20 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 17:58 ` Marius Mauch
2003-10-04 15:56 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 17:29 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 18:27 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 23:38 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 0:48 ` Patrick Börjesson
[not found] ` <200310050343.49697.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 1:52 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 2:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:33 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 14:08 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-04 14:21 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:14 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:50 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-10-04 13:50 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 13:57 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:13 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 17:25 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 23:28 ` Jason Stubbs [this message]
2003-10-05 0:17 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 0:25 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 0:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:48 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 2:10 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:27 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:06 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:44 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 4:54 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-05 5:28 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 0:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:43 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 3:04 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 14:24 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 5:22 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 11:30 ` Jason Stubbs
[not found] ` <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 14:47 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 15:53 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 16:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 6:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 6:34 ` Kumba
2003-10-04 7:27 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-04 13:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:03 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 2:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 4:08 ` Stroller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-05 18:24 Sami Näätänen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310050828.34578.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--to=jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox