From: Peter Ruskin <aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:50:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310041750.48198.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67D8C8CF-F66F-11D7-B976-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
On Saturday 04 Oct 2003 14:33, Stroller wrote:
> I am sure I am doing a huge injustice to the author of genkernel, but
> it's more hassle for me to find out what I did wrong than to continue
> to do things manually.
>
> Please can we keep things simple..? Gentoo is such a great
> distribution, complexity has the potential to diminish it from its
> current (IMO) near perfection. Surely there are far better things for
> inclusion in Portage3. Iis there any timeframe on that, BTW..?
I agree. I also tried genkernel once and took an instant dislike to it.
I'd prefer it if more effort were put into the ability to switch kernels
without having always to remerge nvidia, lm+sensors and the like cf.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1477
Peter
--
======================================================================
Portage 2.0.49-r3 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r1,
2.4.22_pre2-gss)
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+
======================================================================
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-04 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 9:36 [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Brad Laue
2003-10-03 9:54 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 18:12 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 19:26 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 0:41 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04 2:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 3:50 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 15:34 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 16:23 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
[not found] ` <3F7DA0C3.3000303@gentoo.org>
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 17:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-03 23:50 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-03 23:58 ` Kurt Lieber
2003-10-04 0:01 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 2:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 0:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 3:56 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 4:29 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 12:40 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 13:10 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:51 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:15 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:36 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 15:09 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 17:20 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 17:58 ` Marius Mauch
2003-10-04 15:56 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 17:29 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 18:27 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 23:38 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 0:48 ` Patrick Börjesson
[not found] ` <200310050343.49697.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 1:52 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 2:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:33 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 14:08 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-04 14:21 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:14 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:50 ` Peter Ruskin [this message]
2003-10-04 13:50 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 13:57 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:13 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 17:25 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 23:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:17 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 0:25 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 0:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:48 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 2:10 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:27 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:06 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:44 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 4:54 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-05 5:28 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 0:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:43 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 3:04 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 14:24 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 5:22 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 11:30 ` Jason Stubbs
[not found] ` <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 14:47 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 15:53 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 16:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 6:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 6:34 ` Kumba
2003-10-04 7:27 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-04 13:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:03 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 2:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 4:08 ` Stroller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-05 18:24 Sami Näätänen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310041750.48198.aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com \
--to=aoyu93@dsl.pipex.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox