From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@gentoo.org>
To: Stroller <root@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 14:14:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310041414.47289.luke-jr@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67D8C8CF-F66F-11D7-B976-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 October 2003 01:33 pm, Stroller wrote:
> Please can we keep things simple..? Gentoo is such a great
> distribution, complexity has the potential to diminish it from its
> current (IMO) near perfection. Surely there are far better things for
> inclusion in Portage3. Iis there any timeframe on that, BTW..?
We already recommend using genkernel in the manual for 1.4, so moving this
into an ebuild wouldn't be very different from how it is now. Personally, I
am satisfied with how the kernels are done right now, but I brought it up
because it sounds like a feature that could be useful on some systems or by
some people and it would fit more in with the current Portage setup where
everything is automaticly compiled. Though I would like to see the -src
suffix get in at some point even if the kernels stay the same. I keep /var/
tmp/portage, but sometimes it might be nice to have the sources in /usr/src
too. I don't think Portage3 would be neccesary for this... It could probably
be a few well placed lines in the current Portage to add it, though I suppose
I would say the same for sticky USE flags. Can a Portage dev comment on how
complex/simple it would be to implement -src?
- --
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ftXRZl/BHdU+lYMRAv9oAJ99Z52pq+O8ydq1YCTnE6kLVu9J6gCfX208
XDTxmDFfoBlBpNrN9yFn6uQ=
=a+lg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-04 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 9:36 [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Brad Laue
2003-10-03 9:54 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 18:12 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 19:26 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 0:41 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04 2:05 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 3:50 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 15:34 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 16:23 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
[not found] ` <3F7DA0C3.3000303@gentoo.org>
2003-10-03 17:10 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 17:15 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-03 23:50 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-03 23:58 ` Kurt Lieber
2003-10-04 0:01 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 2:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 0:15 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:25 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 3:56 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 4:29 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 12:40 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 13:10 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:51 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:04 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:15 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:36 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 15:09 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 17:20 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 17:58 ` Marius Mauch
2003-10-04 15:56 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 17:29 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 18:27 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 23:38 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 0:48 ` Patrick Börjesson
[not found] ` <200310050343.49697.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 1:52 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05 2:39 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:33 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 14:08 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-04 14:21 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:14 ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2003-10-04 16:50 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-10-04 13:50 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 13:57 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:13 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 17:25 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 23:28 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:17 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 0:25 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 0:38 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 0:48 ` James Harlow
2003-10-05 2:10 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:27 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:06 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 2:44 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 4:54 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-05 5:28 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 0:50 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 2:43 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 3:04 ` Kumba
2003-10-05 14:24 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 5:22 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 11:30 ` Jason Stubbs
[not found] ` <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 14:47 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 15:53 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 16:05 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:06 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 6:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 6:34 ` Kumba
2003-10-04 7:27 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-04 13:16 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 2:03 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 2:08 ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04 4:08 ` Stroller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-05 18:24 Sami Näätänen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310041414.47289.luke-jr@gentoo.org \
--to=luke-jr@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=root@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox