public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@gentoo.org>
To: Stuart Herbert <stuart@gentoo.org>, gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 14:04:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310041404.56692.luke-jr@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200310041451.00705.stuart@gentoo.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 04 October 2003 01:51 pm, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Saturday 04 October 2003 2:10 pm, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > You could always 'emerge linux-src' if Portage were to add the -src
> > suffix as I described.
>
> And what would that give me?  The current range of sources in Portage gives
> me a nice selection of choice.  Personally, I'm very happy with it.
emerge linux-mm-src, then. or emerge linux-redhat-src, if you prefer.
>
> > I don't think it should modify the configurations, only a few symlinks
> > that you can ignore if you choose to.
>
> No thanks.
Just because you choose not to use it doesn't mean you should be forcing other 
people not to be able to. This provides the *option* to use it. Options are 
always best.
>
> > If you'd be compiling the kernel for another system, you could have
> > Portage build only a GRP. As for local dependencies, the
> > development-sources already depend on the module-init-tools needed to run
> > them even though the sources don't actually need it.
>
> And what about kernel modules that are required?  How will those get
> re-compiled?  You can't just re-emerge them, because they have this
> annoying habit of going and deleting the currently-installed version ...
That annoying habit is what should be fixed, then. Using a bug as a reason to 
not implement a feature isn't a good idea... =p
>
> > It might also be worth noting that often
> > the time between a system update and etc-update, your system could in
> > theory be unbootable were there to be a power failure.
>
> I'm sorry, but I really do think that this idea is both stupid, and more
> trouble than it's worth.  Administrators have been managing their boxes
> just fine up to now.
For the most part, what I am suggesting is adding options, not removing them. 
Where people used vanilla-sources in the past (which is quite vague actually; 
why should one assume -sources means it's Linux?), they would now simply be 
using linux-src. redhat-sources would be linux-redhat-src. Users who don't 
care to manually recompile their kernels could move over to using linux or 
linux-redhat. It would also let people emerge things such as kdelibs-src or 
apache-src if they wanted to.
- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ftODZl/BHdU+lYMRAro3AJ4qKFmVGfl8RI959sPi4oscZlodmACgit99
HfUTOcVhd2wq+fEssNKV9AA=
=60BZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-04 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-03  9:36 [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree Brad Laue
2003-10-03  9:54 ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 18:12   ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 19:26     ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04  0:41       ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04  2:05         ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04  3:50           ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 15:34 ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 16:23   ` Brad Laue
2003-10-03 17:10     ` Brian Jackson
     [not found]   ` <3F7DA0C3.3000303@gentoo.org>
2003-10-03 17:10     ` Brian Jackson
2003-10-03 17:15       ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-03 23:50   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-03 23:58     ` Kurt Lieber
2003-10-04  0:01       ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04  2:16         ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04  0:15       ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04  2:25         ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04  3:56           ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04  4:29             ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-04 12:40               ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 13:10                 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:51                   ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:04                     ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2003-10-04 14:15                       ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 14:36                         ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 15:09                           ` Stuart Herbert
2003-10-04 17:20                             ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 17:58                               ` Marius Mauch
2003-10-04 15:56                           ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 17:29                             ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 18:27                               ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 23:38                                 ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05  0:48                                   ` Patrick Börjesson
     [not found]                                   ` <200310050343.49697.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05  1:52                                     ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-05  2:39                                 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:33                 ` Stroller
2003-10-04 14:08                   ` William Kenworthy
2003-10-04 14:21                     ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 14:14                   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:50                   ` Peter Ruskin
2003-10-04 13:50                 ` Patrick Börjesson
2003-10-04 13:57                   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 16:13                     ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-04 17:25                       ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 23:28                       ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05  0:17                         ` Kumba
2003-10-05  0:25                           ` James Harlow
2003-10-05  0:38                             ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05  0:48                               ` James Harlow
2003-10-05  2:10                               ` Kumba
2003-10-05  2:27                                 ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05  2:06                             ` Kumba
2003-10-05  2:44                               ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05  4:54                             ` Jon Portnoy
2003-10-05  5:28                             ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05  0:50                           ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05  2:43                           ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05  3:04                             ` Kumba
2003-10-05 14:24                               ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05  5:22                         ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-05 11:30                           ` Jason Stubbs
     [not found]                             ` <200310051741.28963.sn.ml@bayminer.com>
2003-10-05 14:47                               ` Jason Stubbs
2003-10-05 15:53                                 ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-05 16:05                                   ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04 13:06               ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04  6:16             ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04  6:34     ` Kumba
2003-10-04  7:27     ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-10-04 13:16       ` Luke-Jr
2003-10-04  2:03   ` Stroller
2003-10-04  2:08     ` Donnie Berkholz
2003-10-04  4:08       ` Stroller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-05 18:24 Sami Näätänen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200310041404.56692.luke-jr@gentoo.org \
    --to=luke-jr@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    --cc=stuart@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox