From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24047 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Oct 2003 02:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 16894 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2003 02:16:39 -0000 From: Luke-Jr Organization: Gentoo Linux To: Jason Stubbs , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 02:16:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <3F7D4315.1020900@gentoo.org> <20031003235812.GV10917@mail.lieber.org> <200310040901.55155.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> In-Reply-To: <200310040901.55155.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> GPG-Public-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD53E9583 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="shift_jis" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310040216.32951.luke-jr@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Speaking of new kernels being added to the tree X-Archives-Salt: 11460fbc-4a33-4858-8a21-bbf7599c6b62 X-Archives-Hash: 37df83a8b00f19c1e1f1229f509fa429 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 04 October 2003 12:01 am, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Agreed. Genkernel would also prevent the addition of other patches by > hand... Same reply as I sent to klieber. =3Dp =2D --=20 Luke-Jr Developer, Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/ =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/fi18Zl/BHdU+lYMRAnE3AJ9OS1v9Cua2eQ84AjZwQ65k5xhJ6QCfd121 JxUKq/4yc2AU6RFn/PCOZ6c=3D =3D2GSn =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list