Re: [gentoo-dev] SuSE Kernel Sources

["C. Brewer" <cbrewer@stealthaccess.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]

I hear what you're saying, but I guess I wasn't particularly clear.
Basically, you have the fix for it, and it's nice, and it works. However,
what I was trying to get at is this- rather than write an eclass, why not
fix the package itself and kick it back to Slack? Sure, there's a chance
they won't care to change it, and the eclass would be necessary, but now
we're at a point with everyone fixing everything, the tree is getting to
carry almost the amount of patches as it does packages. So I apologize if
I'm unclear or frustrated, but it feels as if rather than sharpen an old
knife to do the work, we just make a new knife. I realize that's not the
intent of anyone, but if the fixes and work arounds don't get back
upstream, how long until patches and fixes do outweigh the packages?
(I'm up to ~60k files from the ~20k when I first installed!)


-- 
Chuck Brewer
Registered Linux User #284015
Get my gpg public key at pgp.mit.edu!! Encrypted e-mail preferred.



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]