From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20723 invoked by uid 1002); 26 Sep 2003 20:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2643 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 20:16:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:16:53 -0400 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-ID: <20030926201653.GA22319@time> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org References: <200309260001.03079.vapier@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309260001.03079.vapier@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: make & emake X-Archives-Salt: 0af31880-82fc-4376-b33f-9f3e4aa044f4 X-Archives-Hash: 28c6ad92b5e4ee96136d7c401b54d2f3 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Vapier wrote: [Fri Sep 26 2003, 12:00:55AM EDT] > so if no one else has anything to say about this, i'd like to start pushi= ng=20 > via the documentation for usage of `emake -j1` instead of `make` This is what I've been doing for a while... Guess it just never found its way back to documentation Aron --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/dJ61j4fhHpnCm4kRAsPdAJ91zYJ/OElbHoTUTm96Iz/0cdzM9gCghpkS ByzPzhwODUXfYQKhXF3KKbk= =nSHh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--