From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9732 invoked by uid 1002); 19 Sep 2003 19:05:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 22442 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2003 19:05:21 -0000 From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 21:04:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <3F627BCD.6050006@adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <3F627BCD.6050006@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_oN1a/MID7njFp1G"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200309192105.12254.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_KMAIL autolearn=ham version=2.55-uvt4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-uvt4 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-ng (Milter interface) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenOffice ebuilds X-Archives-Salt: 41991d4b-c73b-432b-b699-2e09c0d03196 X-Archives-Hash: 9398315834ff89e80c5ba94df9d40c3e --Boundary-02=_oN1a/MID7njFp1G Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 13 September 2003 04:07, Matthew Vaughn wrote: > This is an ongoing and perplexing problem that many in the forums have > brought up and reported; however, it has not been resolved. There is > what I consider to be a defect in the app-office/openoffice ebuilds that > causes the /opt/OpenOffice.org/program/ directory to somehow be > completely after compilation and yet the ebuild exits with a success > state. Be aware that I am using no non-default settings (including > FEATURES=3D"") for this build. I have reluctantly resigned myself to the > binary packages for the time being but I am frustrated by the lack of > answers regarding this particular difficulty. > There are active bugs that seem to deal with this, but none directly > point out the problem. For fear of unnecessary redundancy, I will not > submit a new bug without clearing it here. I wonder (despite the > activity on the boards, every thread ends with a question and is not > resolved) if anything is being done at the time being. > Maybe I'm totally wrong and just need to be pointed to a document or > article someone posted somewhere. I'd appreciate the education at this > point. > I try to maintain the openoffice ebuilds (help is welcome). They are extrem= ely=20 complex so cut me some slack. I've also been away on holidays so I could no= t=20 have possibly fixed anything. Could you fill me in what happens here, are y= ou=20 trying to remerge openoffice of the same openoffice version. In that case=20 there could be a problem if the files have similar change dates. Also did y= ou=20 merge with buildpkg or not? If so, please check whether the files are=20 included in the tbz2 package (just tar tfj ). Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --Boundary-02=_oN1a/MID7njFp1G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/a1NobKx5DBjWFdsRAjnYAJwJUXKhhH3i/TLlkSXXu7FjLIzZTwCfcl9j ahTS1i5LZFMuEBAlHuLab8c= =bC+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_oN1a/MID7njFp1G--