From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23920 invoked by uid 1002); 17 Sep 2003 20:50:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 19977 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 20:50:05 -0000 From: Mike Frysinger Reply-To: vapier@gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:50:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200309162132.01170.vapier@gentoo.org> <200309171905.22047.arutha@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <200309171905.22047.arutha@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_DkMa/S0IP4lbUKv"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200309171650.11515.vapier@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo X-Archives-Salt: 318029bd-fa04-43a0-bb45-1a7f7515189e X-Archives-Hash: f83defe00c089708fa51ef4fe18d1f43 --Boundary-02=_DkMa/S0IP4lbUKv Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 17 September 2003 13:05, Alexander Gretencord wrote: > On Wednesday 17 September 2003 03:32, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > with all this openssh crap thats been happening today, i was wondering = if > > anyone made ebuilds for lsh (and thus liboop) for Gentoo ... i was > > looking at liboop and they use the autotools pretty poorly imho ... > > Well there are ebuilds in bugzilla but carpaski set them to fixed without > bothering to add them to the official portage tree as noone seemed to be > interested in those ebuilds. Maybe you have better luck this time. Tell us > about the bug report here so we can all post, so it gets in this time :) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28971 > > i made a few patches so as to make those aspects optional, but i cant g= et > > the autotools to regenerate the Makefile.in and configure files correct= ly > > Well if you figure it out, send the patches to the maintainers, they > probably just didn't add such things as nobody complained and they don't > see a need for that. Was the same with a DESTDIR variable in chrony until= I > wanted to make an ebuild. Richard was quite pleased with the patch once he > saw the need for that. yeah i usually do ... i just hate it when a package goes unmaintained upstr= eam=20 and we have to basically sit on the patches ;( =2Dmike --Boundary-02=_DkMa/S0IP4lbUKv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAP2jJA0FjO5/oN/WBAQLzqRAAhX9gsuRbp12XqIWLp/Ii9kT5gfdLtcvk 3qFcNXuemwJ1oyMnhdi/ISlSHFIcfwZRFL/N1qWJQyPLU9eZZK9ftgBAsyk/77gO MzfwTNO5W/L1imLTubBZqX5CcnqROmtdzVEdAK2HrtXAoXQE1NPe1mmDJNuT9odg mvfF/QkJMJOJGcSbXaKef8OntZ+LV+pstWrxWdwW8dZASV32LoNkIlHXAXnFXu3i GbjS7cZYpoNbS6Grs4Mcuy+qWK5ZsM8nuPj9/fHuSt7tzsUQX0yR7vM1BiMm9n+0 MyY2hIBalt0HqA+D5MOXJTzXBBBbtrfKa483gUtVrjR463h+GKbQKxW1ti08JqeF fUVAhXFqjXoBQ9L9NQQjTlsDdf8fnlgKitpgyx5Z4HrpLLgW73/mJJi0k+GkZR2o OlZ/cowacdJGF7AmnNZ/hN+UegSIaEmMWQvVAHZmF1Noj2QczxY85Qu0Qa+sV9Vi PLyz1cxJj5N5VY/nWHI08OBuNA1EDUm9k7PNZwUmZ9Yxi6LkAZaAwGvoPAfWrXTo xIuJjNxpzypFWwMPKDoEz0xci28+aTJZRvDd2mKBPBoeXQir6dYZta+8kzmVEXCJ hVh6i3hTK9fsy4TtAl5V/A2l+mAVBc7haqAHLjH90N2bGP5nKDTKa/Ej/UPSXeR4 ocPs4ymS9iM= =HSjI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_DkMa/S0IP4lbUKv--