From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19475 invoked by uid 1002); 16 Sep 2003 00:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28473 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 00:59:07 -0000 From: Steven Elling To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:58:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <3F6617A1.70807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <3F6617A1.70807@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309151958.49100.ellings@kcnet.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some suggestions X-Archives-Salt: 0eab4f43-bc11-4b0e-84f4-f5b99aacc9a7 X-Archives-Hash: dacaac0fa173102d20d09b9443cebd4b On Monday 15 September 2003 14:48, Stewart Honsberger wrote: > David Sankel wrote: > I personally find it aggravating when I update a long-overdue system > (which can be as little as 2 months with Gentoo's expedient updates) and > having to plough through ~250 files with etc-update - atleast half of > which I've never touched / couldn't care less about. Granted, there is a > "-3 - update all remaining files" option, but that's still tedious. Not to mention dangerous. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list