From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:39:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030915183907.GA8162@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1063650629.13890.3.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Brad Laue wrote:
> I was going more for the manageability aspect - drop Gentoo in place
> inside 30 minutes, update to the latest GRP packages, then begin
> optimizing - I'd like to think of myself as an advanced user, and I'd
> really find it traumatic to have to wait 56 hours for my Athlon XP to
> rebuild from stage1 into GNOME 2.4 and get myself back to a functional
> workstation.
I'm sure you've tried Debian or any other distribution then, because that's
exactly what they do. They provide you with a quick and easy installation of
binary packages. For the packages you want optimization, they provide an easy
way to create packages for it.
If I want my system to return to Gnome 2.4 after some crash, I use my
backups. If I install Gentoo, I know that I have to wait a certain amount of
time, but thats what I expect from a source-based distribution. If I want a
quick installation, I'll use a different distribution.
This is a harsh state of mind, but I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking
like this.
> > This is something that all distributions deliver: binary packages and an
> > "easy" way to source-compile packages but keep them in the database. If
> > Gentoo would go the same way, we are neglecting the source-based stuff.
>
> How so, beyond what we currently do with GRP?
I dislike GRP too. I feel that it takes (development) resources from us that
could be invested in more innovative projects. I feel that GRP is an effort
to reach more users instead of focussing on what Gentoo really was about
several months back.
I like to make the comparison with security-based projects. Their main goal
is to create a secure distribution/program. They will never try lowering down
that vision to get more people to use their distribution/program.
With security, saying "no" is easy because it is a strong subject. With
source-based vs binary this is less easy.
I must say, this is a personal opinion that I do not integrate in my work for
Gentoo (just to set the record straight).
Wkr,
Sven Vermeulen
--
^__^ And Larry saw that it was Good.
(oo) Sven Vermeulen
(__) http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Documentation Project
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 15:59 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP Brad Laue
2003-09-15 16:36 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 16:52 ` Luke-Jr
2003-09-15 17:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 17:20 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 17:48 ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-15 18:29 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:01 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
[not found] ` <1063649926.13582.2.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>
2003-09-16 21:20 ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-17 15:37 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:04 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:30 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 18:39 ` Sven Vermeulen [this message]
2003-09-15 18:53 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 19:05 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 19:06 ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 20:18 ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:16 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 19:10 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-16 16:34 ` Alexander Gretencord
2003-09-17 5:45 ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-09-15 18:38 ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-09-15 18:42 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 21:09 ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 23:33 ` Sven Blumenstein
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15 22:15 Thomas Schweikle
2003-09-15 22:49 ` donnie berkholz
2003-09-15 23:05 ` Marius Mauch
2003-09-16 3:54 ` Matt Thrailkill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030915183907.GA8162@gentoo.org \
--to=swift@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox