public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:39:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030915183907.GA8162@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1063650629.13890.3.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Brad Laue wrote:
> I was going more for the manageability aspect - drop Gentoo in place
> inside 30 minutes, update to the latest GRP packages, then begin
> optimizing - I'd like to think of myself as an advanced user, and I'd
> really find it traumatic to have to wait 56 hours for my Athlon XP to
> rebuild from stage1 into GNOME 2.4 and get myself back to a functional
> workstation.

I'm sure you've tried Debian or any other distribution then, because that's
exactly what they do. They provide you with a quick and easy installation of
binary packages. For the packages you want optimization, they provide an easy
way to create packages for it.

If I want my system to return to Gnome 2.4 after some crash, I use my
backups. If I install Gentoo, I know that I have to wait a certain amount of
time, but thats what I expect from a source-based distribution. If I want a
quick installation, I'll use a different distribution.
 
This is a harsh state of mind, but I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking
like this.

> > This is something that all distributions deliver: binary packages and an
> > "easy" way to source-compile packages but keep them in the database. If
> > Gentoo would go the same way, we are neglecting the source-based stuff.
> 
> How so, beyond what we currently do with GRP?

I dislike GRP too. I feel that it takes (development) resources from us that
could be invested in more innovative projects. I feel that GRP is an effort
to reach more users instead of focussing on what Gentoo really was about
several months back. 

I like to make the comparison with security-based projects. Their main goal
is to create a secure distribution/program. They will never try lowering down
that vision to get more people to use their distribution/program. 

With security, saying "no" is easy because it is a strong subject. With
source-based vs binary this is less easy.


I must say, this is a personal opinion that I do not integrate in my work for
Gentoo (just to set the record straight).

Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen

-- 
 ^__^   And Larry saw that it was Good.
 (oo)                                      Sven Vermeulen
 (__)   http://www.gentoo.org              Gentoo Documentation Project

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-15 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-15 15:59 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP Brad Laue
2003-09-15 16:36 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 16:52 ` Luke-Jr
2003-09-15 17:08   ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-09-15 17:20     ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 17:48       ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-15 18:29         ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:01           ` Philippe Lafoucrière
     [not found]         ` <1063649926.13582.2.camel@Discovery.brad-x.com>
2003-09-16 21:20           ` Brian Jackson
2003-09-17 15:37             ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:04 ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 18:30   ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 18:39     ` Sven Vermeulen [this message]
2003-09-15 18:53       ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 19:05       ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 19:06         ` Jon Portnoy
2003-09-15 20:18           ` Brad Laue
2003-09-15 21:16             ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 19:10         ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-16 16:34           ` Alexander Gretencord
2003-09-17  5:45             ` Patrick Kursawe
2003-09-15 18:38   ` Andrew Gaffney
2003-09-15 18:42     ` Sven Vermeulen
2003-09-15 21:09       ` Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-09-15 23:33 ` Sven Blumenstein
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15 22:15 Thomas Schweikle
2003-09-15 22:49 ` donnie berkholz
2003-09-15 23:05   ` Marius Mauch
2003-09-16  3:54   ` Matt Thrailkill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030915183907.GA8162@gentoo.org \
    --to=swift@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox