From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 383 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Sep 2003 16:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28691 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 16:29:32 -0000 From: Norberto Bensa To: Markus Krainer Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:29:27 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <1063553745.24169.25.camel@legolas.local.lan> In-Reply-To: <1063553745.24169.25.camel@legolas.local.lan> Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_pdJZ/Y2tkbJ9Orf"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200309141329.29812.nbensa@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3 SLOT question X-Archives-Salt: 856147b7-1ed2-4d45-a21a-c569266b8600 X-Archives-Hash: ef2be304ea8cb89d9f3c604f88a8393b --Boundary-02=_pdJZ/Y2tkbJ9Orf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline Markus Krainer wrote: > I want to > use gcc-3.3 as default and want to use gcc-3.2 for those packages that > do not compile with gcc-3.3 Errrrr..... Why don't you just report the packages that don't build with=20 3.3.x?? I'm using gcc 3.3.1 and ntfsprogs didn't build. I filled a bug report and a= =20 few days after there was a patch. Now I have ntfsprogs compiled with 3.3.1= =20 :-P Regards, Norberto --Boundary-02=_pdJZ/Y2tkbJ9Orf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/ZJdpFXVF50lmS74RAqjRAJ9qVvGttv2HMibDvYlsdWcedJLcAgCfbv6F B2M6eVpCbnDow9XAJhdZCD0= =hmL3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_pdJZ/Y2tkbJ9Orf--