From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31261 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Sep 2003 11:44:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 25409 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 11:44:02 -0000 From: "Alberto G. Hierro" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:46:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200309130126.15934.fiam@asturlinux.org> <200309130308.42653.fiam@asturlinux.org> <20030913032537.4ea4fa2a.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030913032537.4ea4fa2a.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309131346.49469.fiam@asturlinux.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage X-Archives-Salt: bd14dfb3-d052-44aa-87d7-d120d98cab65 X-Archives-Hash: 4c236689cf0845de9fa8e90b61ba496c =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El S=E1bado, 13 de Septiembre de 2003 03:25, Thomas de Grenier de Latour=20 escribi=F3: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:08:34 +0200 > > "Alberto G. Hierro" wrote: > > I haven't any pfeifer-sources slotted 2.4.20, so what's upgrading > > portage? > > He install the latest available version of the package, as requested. > Sure, "-U" flag prevents downgrades, but since this is not a downgrade > because of slots... Ok, so i'll inject it. Thanks =2D --=20 /* Alberto G. Hierro (Skyhusker) */ /* Linux User #298867 */ =09 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/YwOn4O6JklHkL2cRAoCKAJ9b9esPsOWPHK0Ds6LAfh/Cx/9I6gCcCdEa kEbIy15TrqnpZtcvxnw8ekc=3D =3DR9Iv =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list