From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6651-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 2043 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Sep 2003 01:25:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 22082 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 01:25:38 -0000
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:25:37 +0200
From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Message-Id: <20030913032537.4ea4fa2a.degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200309130308.42653.fiam@asturlinux.org>
References: <200309130126.15934.fiam@asturlinux.org>
	<20030913020852.4230ca02.degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
	<200309130308.42653.fiam@asturlinux.org>
Organization: Fasmz
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage
X-Archives-Salt: 5a48085b-1891-4ca1-9bda-6147582b49da
X-Archives-Hash: 518e48272a597ed516c3782d23645cea

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:08:34 +0200
"Alberto G. Hierro" <fiam@asturlinux.org> wrote:

>  I haven't any pfeifer-sources slotted 2.4.20, so what's upgrading
>  portage?

He install the latest available version of the package, as requested.
Sure, "-U" flag prevents downgrades, but since this is not a downgrade
because of slots...  

-- 
TGL.

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list