From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26694 invoked by uid 1002); 13 Sep 2003 01:05:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14826 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 01:05:56 -0000 From: "Alberto G. Hierro" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 03:08:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200309130126.15934.fiam@asturlinux.org> <20030913020852.4230ca02.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> In-Reply-To: <20030913020852.4230ca02.degrenier@easyconnect.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309130308.42653.fiam@asturlinux.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Strange behaviour in portage X-Archives-Salt: 9e9fd27f-727e-42bf-ba48-a2e827b7bb19 X-Archives-Hash: fc5eab128586be3b37d00435de32a7b7 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El S=E1bado, 13 de Septiembre de 2003 02:08, Thomas de Grenier de Latour=20 escribi=F3: > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 01:26:10 +0200 > "Alberto G. Hierro" (by way of Alberto G. Hierro > > ) wrote: > > Why is pfeifer-sources going to be downgraded (i used -U) and why > > emerge shows it as an upgrade? > > It's not a downgrade, it's an upgrade in 2.4.20 slot. Your 2.4.21 > version won't be affected. As we can see in /var/db/pkg/sys-kernel/ :=20 fiam@ixnay fiam $ ls /var/db/pkg/sys-kernel/ genkernel-1.8 linux-headers-2.4.19-r1 gentoo-sources-2.4.20-r7 pfeifer-sources-2.4.21.1_pre4 I haven't any pfeifer-sources slotted 2.4.20, so what's upgrading portage? I know 2.4.21 won't be affected, but I don't want two versions installed on= my=20 system if I only use one of them. > > > Is this a bug or is the expected behaviour? > > I would say "minor bug" since it's only about output, or a somehow > "expected behavior" since it's now well known :) > See bug #18608 for a possible fix to the cosmetic part of this issue, > and bug #4698 for a more in depth discussion. =2D --=20 /* Alberto G. Hierro (Skyhusker) */ /* Linux User #298867 */ =09 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Ym4X4O6JklHkL2cRAvjfAJ9T6BbJ0Q6a2zfh8otBc2O7Y5WYhwCfZ6rc NeWBcNMkVvXY4iwtfa63yMw=3D =3DBR6Q =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list