From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6288 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 07:44:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 20446 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 07:44:59 -0000 X-WM-Posted-At: mailandnews.com; Mon, 8 Sep 03 03:44:58 -0400 From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:43:45 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <1062966830.8455.203.camel@nosferatu.lan> <20030907234744.6e742cca.spider@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030907234744.6e742cca.spider@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309081643.45439.jasonbstubbs@mailandnews.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.1-r1 X-Archives-Salt: de01906e-d8cc-4d5d-bada-aab095a21999 X-Archives-Hash: e6721790e3a341c69f74886000e4a4e9 On Monday 08 September 2003 06:47, Spider wrote: > Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > Hi > > > > Yes the intention was to have it '~x86'. Spider did not check > > with me *before* he changed it (:D), but that is ok - I will > > change that in a week or so if nothing major happens. > > > > > > Thanks, > > ooops , Since when I saw you checked in and said it was intended I > changed it back again. So, does this mean I should file a bug report for all the packages I've been unable to compile with gcc331 (if not listed already)? Some I've got patches for - file those too? Should I have done this already? Jason -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list