From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12789 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 19:43:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 31420 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 19:43:52 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:44:56 -0400 From: Jason Wever To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030908154456.6c0e4ef8.weeve@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030908095439.GA25079@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20030908095439.GA25079@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.AK+.eTO8+A7FGr" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] DB4.0/4.1 news X-Archives-Salt: 7ecb9caa-28c9-4509-be30-e0643203181a X-Archives-Hash: 3d7e5cbe4d2c2832d72d435bc30f5496 --=.AK+.eTO8+A7FGr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 02:54:39 -0700 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > In line with this, and hopefully to make some progress, I have marked > db-4.0.14-r2 as stable on x86, and marked it as testing on all other > architectures. > > Would all non-x86 people please test it out? Upgrade to it, then try to > re-merge at least the packages that depend on sys-libs/db and not a > specific version of the db library. An emerge -e world is probably a > much better test. Hi, Please make a bug for this and CC all the arches you want to test it. Thanks, -- Jason Wever Gentoo/Sparc Team Co-Lead --=.AK+.eTO8+A7FGr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/XNw8dKvgdVioq28RAv+EAKCdhZ2HkJ0MVGUPAU575+8hnp2oewCfb/Ta XmbZG4PqWmNLg8WwJVBh5CU= =cevu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.AK+.eTO8+A7FGr--