From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20235 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 02:48:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 10254 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 02:48:17 -0000 From: Jan Krueger Organization: microgalaxy.net To: azarah@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:53:47 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Jon Portnoy , Gentoo-Dev References: <200309080249.15527.jk@microgalaxy.net> <1062983557.8455.240.camel@nosferatu.lan> In-Reply-To: <1062983557.8455.240.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309080453.47363.jk@microgalaxy.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] suggestion portage ebuild system file modification rights and protection X-Archives-Salt: c954701a-029d-4a24-9673-abfc87f6aca6 X-Archives-Hash: d143d671a6dd4fd85519b560d346a2b9 On Monday 08 September 2003 01:12, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > What about taking a nice holiday for a change, then come back > after you pulled up a nice 100+ page draft with suggestions, > working code, and some sample changes to offensive ebuilds? There is no need. Its all out there on the net. Go read it. Dont look for "ebuilds", look for "ports", "packages", "automated software installation" and learn. Open up a little bit, install it, try it out and learn. Its not that portage is something completly new. really. It just introduces some nice enhancements to the existing things out there. Others did research on automated software installation. Others already made the mistakes. Even the organizational ones (from my point of view). Its out there. here is the url: http://www.google.com -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list