From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17715 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 02:28:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26895 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 02:28:41 -0000 From: Jan Krueger Organization: microgalaxy.net To: Seemant Kulleen , gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:34:11 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200309080312.54258.jk@microgalaxy.net> <20030907184408.622c5aa8.seemant@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20030907184408.622c5aa8.seemant@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309080434.11900.jk@microgalaxy.net> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-project X-Archives-Salt: 2ce5158c-cbf9-4444-8597-c452a8cfb94c X-Archives-Hash: 276f6c54486d95357acb5c3067688559 On Monday 08 September 2003 01:44, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > > Ok, thats true. Based on what i have seen so far i was assuming > > certain aspects. That may have been wrong. Your right. So: > > How is the gentoo-project going to be organized in general? > > Specifically to ensure quality? > > and security? > > Exactly what do you mean by "going to be organized in general"? You > seem to imply we are not organised and just a bunch of hacker-monkeys > banging away. No, i was assuming the organization is changing/developing. Thank you for the links, i was unable to find them from them main page. Jan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list