From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-6499-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 22397 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 01:07:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 26007 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 01:07:23 -0000
From: Jan Krueger <jk@microgalaxy.net>
Organization: microgalaxy.net
To: azarah@gentoo.org
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 03:12:54 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
Cc: Chris Bainbridge <C.J.Bainbridge@ed.ac.uk>,
 Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
References: <pan.2003.09.06.18.05.15.543497@nonconformity.net> <200309080233.18134.jk@microgalaxy.net> <1062982955.8455.230.camel@nosferatu.lan>
In-Reply-To: <1062982955.8455.230.camel@nosferatu.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200309080312.54258.jk@microgalaxy.net>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-project
X-Archives-Salt: b279876e-d496-4904-94f0-4415779307dd
X-Archives-Hash: 28b8433274d959694cd963f717f95919

On Monday 08 September 2003 01:02, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> But you did not ask either.

Ok, thats true. Based on what i have seen so far i was assuming certain 
aspects. That may have been wrong. Your right. So:
How is the gentoo-project going to be organized in general?
Specifically to ensure quality?
and security?

Jan


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list