From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4456 invoked by uid 1002); 8 Sep 2003 01:45:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 28865 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2003 01:45:13 -0000 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 18:44:08 -0700 From: Seemant Kulleen To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Message-Id: <20030907184408.622c5aa8.seemant@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200309080312.54258.jk@microgalaxy.net> References: <200309080233.18134.jk@microgalaxy.net> <1062982955.8455.230.camel@nosferatu.lan> <200309080312.54258.jk@microgalaxy.net> Organization: Gentoo Linux X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="b=.Cum0I'BeD2/7i" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-project X-Archives-Salt: 4d1136c6-f0ec-4792-b25c-40ec897d03d2 X-Archives-Hash: a78bb6c27b1e3a71ace8bed8a4d00bbe --b=.Cum0I'BeD2/7i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Ok, thats true. Based on what i have seen so far i was assuming > certain aspects. That may have been wrong. Your right. So: > How is the gentoo-project going to be organized in general? > Specifically to ensure quality? > and security? Exactly what do you mean by "going to be organized in general"? You seem to imply we are not organised and just a bunch of hacker-monkeys banging away. I can assure you we are not. If you are interested in the way the project itself is structured, see http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure If you are interested in how we are handling the inevitable gaps in communication that comes with an ever-growing project, look at: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel If you have any specific questions, please ask those instead of the approach you're currently taking. The perception of your posts has been as though you have been relentlessly *attacking* us, who provide *you* with a way of doing this -- you, who chooses to use it of your own volition. That is really not very constructive, and will lead to people getting defencive. As you have seen, this thread degenerated. (My own general rule of thumb is that if a thread goes longer than 5 messages with a repeat/restate, it's not worth reading, but anyway). I, and I am sure I speak for others, request that you take your thoughts, and present them with details, and in a cohesive manner, and then present them, instead of bomarding this list with restated vague and general questions. Sorry if I'm sounding harsh, but I'd rather see this thread concluding on a productive note. Thanks, -- Seemant Kulleen Developer and Project Co-ordinator, Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E --b=.Cum0I'BeD2/7i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/W97s7aJl2DRYeA4RAtZ/AJ4trWIPS1aRqmPRN3bpri/22Jk1wACgj/tw iwK99dPE8GapGx6eLBFKzoI= =/jmc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b=.Cum0I'BeD2/7i--